Archive for the Design Semiotics Category

July 2010

Feast Magazine Debuts, Designed by TOKY

We attended the debut launch party of Catherine Neville’s new FEAST Magazine last night, and finally got our hands on a copy of the real thing.

After 100 days of immersing ourselves in the design of everything FEAST — from the new logo to the grid structure to the look and feel of the publication to the CMS-driven web site design — as well as final design of the magazine’s two main feature stories — it was nice to see the first issue printed and looking, well… pretty OK.

There were a lot of changes that we noticed in the magazine from our original files, but that’s to be expected as magazine designers turn over templates to internal art directors (kudos to Lisa Triefenbach, the magazine’s new AD, for getting this issue to the finish line!).

So we’re going to make this week a full-on feast of “FEAST” on our blog. We think this will be a nice way to present the reality of how designs can change from the designer’s hands to final execution, and to celebrate the arrival of a long-expected labor of love for Katy, Liz, Kirsten, and Becky on our team.

Today, a before and after of the first issue’s cover. The TOKY team designed this WEEKS ago (and were asked to keep the subject on the hush-hush) and finally saw the printed copies for the first time last night. The changes that we noted are subtle but interesting for students of design: the red FEAST logo has gone yellow and lost it’s shading behind Tuan Lee’s monumental burger, our more understated white type headline has been boxed in honkin’ white bars, and the lack of yellow highlights in the above-the-logo teasers. Otherwise… pretty much what we designed.

Tomorrow: the White Barn Burgers feature story — before and after.

Bookmark and Share
June 2010

Dead Brand Walking

BP Oil Spill Protest Graphic by Anonymous Designer

In light of the recent and on-going BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster catastrophe horror, an event that will be a benchmark regarding our use of fossil fuels, I ask you to turn a moment to something else— something paltry in comparison. BP’s brand image.

In the year 2000, and at the cost of over $200 million dollars (a drop of oil in their bucket), British Petroleum launched their new logo and public identity with a well-orchestrated advertising and PR campaign. I remember well how my local Amoco station, with their red, white and blue colors, slowly and methodically began to morph over the period of that year into a new company, a company simply called “BP”. My acceptance of the new brand mark was cautious at first, as the green and yellow sun/flower shape was so dramatically different from anything I had ever seen. As the brand began to unfold that year, from “BP/Amoco” to “BP” to eventually changing the colors of the entire station, I finally came to believe the branding was absolutely brilliant. Metaphorically, the new brand mark just felt global, and it referenced the sun, the earth, flowers and plants—and it was fundamentally different that any other brand in the oil industry. Over the years, I actually came to feel good about buying my gas at BP because little by little, I too, was drinking the Kool-Aid.

BTW, it was branding powerhouse Landor who began the branding work in 1998, and they did it well. Landor designers and strategists worked with Amoco/BP corporate officials to discover a new brand “that would reflect attributes the company aspired to.” Those attributes were performance, environmental leadership, innovation and progressive ideas.”

Just yesterday I found the following on the BP web site: “Safe and reliable operations are integral to BP’s success, and we strive continuously to improve our safety record.” Ri-iight.

When CEO Tony said “I want my life back!” —where was his sensitivity to the 11 men killed on his oil rig? PR gaffe after PR gaffe were to follow, including saying numerous times to Congress that he “could not recall” certain key issues regarding safety. This was after it was revealed that BP went “on the cheap” for safety measures, pushed workers to work faster, and received nearly 800 safety violations in the last three years alone.

Now, the enviro-friendly BP mark that slowly won over this admittedly tough, brand consumer 10 years ago, is as dead in the oil-mucked water as the multitudes of fish, waterfowl, amphibians, shrimp and wetlands his company has killed. Accident? Yes it was an accident. But this was a “world changing” accident that occurred because the company failed to live up to it’s brand promises. Sadly, it has been shown that safety was second or third behind profit.

The beautifully designed BP brand mark now stands for ineptitude, false promises and a preventable environmental disaster that may be biblical in its proportions. BP will never be the same, and may never regain consumer respect. Now the brand mark is being parodied, heckled and vandalized all over the world. I may be wrong, but I say it’s time for BP live up to their commitments to fix this problem, then quietly reemerge as a better, different, and more committed company.

Bookmark and Share
March 2010

Sparing No Expense

Like many premium product brands of today, cigar box labels of the late 19th century were designed to express something of the highest quality. Cigar manufacturer’s wished to express two things to potential buyers—great taste and high-quality tobacco. Cigar smoking was at the height of popularity at the turn of the century, so naturally competition to influence a potential consumer was fierce. Given that every cigar manufacturer said their tobacco leaf and finely rolled cigars provided exceptional taste and the highest quality, how did they express that to the consumer? They did it by sparing no expense with the latest printing, embossing, foil stamping and highest quality graphic design they could find.

The label shown at top, for Ninus brand cigars, was no exception. The colors are still rich and beautiful, and the gold foil and embossing would make any buyer of this product feel as if they were opening something rare and expensive— lessons that continue today with so many consumer products across many categories. I contend that the very act of just opening a box of cigars, the process of breaking the seal, lifting the lid, and witnessing the tight and perfect arrangement of the cigars inside was, in effect, like the distant memory of opening a special gift in childhood. Dr. Freud would be all over this theory.

For Bank Note cigars, their branding strategy led them towards the look of a finely engraved monetary bank note—certainly an expensive look in the marketing war to win the hearts, minds (and taste) of the cigar smoking gentlemen of the day.

Images found on eBay.

Bookmark and Share
November 2009

txtng is the new copywriting

LOL CompositeWe see these Ameren outdoor boards all over our city promoting energy usage. The concept is that they promote efficiency in the design without all those pesky unnecessary letters, so that “Save Energy” becomes SAV NRGY (although I suppose they couldn’t say “SAV NRG” for fear of upsetting NRG Energy Corporation. That would have been downright impolite, despite a whole consonant’s worth of extra efficiency).

This is not the first time we’ve seen the creep of txtng into advertising culture. The Arnell Group’s horrid Pepsi campaign (pointing to refresheverything.com) was a few months earlier, and even more widepread. And now we’re seeing the same ideas recycled yet again in an anti-Obama campaign. Pepsi, Obama and the GOP look at the letter “O” and see a void to be filled. Herb Lubalin is LOLing in his grave.

Bookmark and Share